美学 DFAs SEISEN ZEMINARY SVETAKALPA BODHISATTA 1 BODHISATTA 2 CHRIST SOY — ECONOMICS NITRIC OXY SEX

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

THE MINIMALLY INTERESTING WAY TO MAKE MINIMALLY INTERESTING DFAs SHOWS THE ARCHETYPAL BEAUTY OF CURRENT MODELS OF PHYSICS

Kewei Zhou 周可为 : @ 4 Maffey Crescent, Richmond Hill : born in 1996, Wuhan, China : born & still totally deaf : #1 of ~100 million @ World of Tanks in 2012 & 2013 (4857DPG 85.5%WR T57 @ 200 games in 2012, pre 8.6 : ~5050DPG ~70%WR 268 & E4 @ 100 games in 2013, post 8.6) : raw & natty benched 285LBs @ 83KG & 185CM after 6 months benching : 1015LBs total lifts @ 83KG : 96KG @ 15% bodyfat untrained in 2025 : University of Waterloo Software Engineering 2014/16 dropout : masturbated to my 北方 female bullies : 4chan /pol/ & /lit/ reader & poster : NEET

 

HOW TO MAKE & READ THE DFAs

There are 3 major steps in making the DFAs. (We can't say for sure what the minimally interesting ways to do these things are, but we can say, conventionally, that they are probably the basic operations found in computer science.)

(1) Create the minimally interesting set of characters. Take the set of all strings of even length, whose characters are either 0 or 1, & then take the subset of strings of length 6 (why? to be explained later), represented by lines or broken lines.

(2) Use the minimally interesting way to make edges between the characters. To generate a hierarchical tree, for each string of this type of length 6, create a substring by concatenating substrings of indices 234 + 345, & draw an edge between that string & the string formed by the concatenation. To generate nontree edges of type A between the characters, for each string of this type of length 6, create a substring by concatenating substrings of indices 456 + 123, & draw an edge between that string & the string formed by the concatenation.

Why do things this way? Because, retroactively (why? to be explained later), it's all about pairs & binaries, so you take halves/trigrams & combine them in different ways. You have 123 + 456, 456 + 123, 234 + 345, & 345 + 234. The first is an identity operation. The 2nd creates type A nontree edges. The 3rd creates a hierarchical tree. The 4th creates type B nontree edges. The first is unused, & the 4th is redundant because you can just do the 2nd & which compresses the 4th in the 8 digits DFA (how? to be explained later). So only the 2nd & the 3rd are really used.

(3) Parse & order things in the minimally interesting way. Parse & order by depthfirst tree parse (b/c that's the most natural way & an archetype in computer science), then parse & order things by decreasing number of lines (b/c it's smoothest to do 000000 111111 010101 101010, & you want to be as consistent as possible about ordering things by decreasing lines). (& the order of the middle of the tertiaries don't matter much, but I ordered them by decreasing polarity & energy.) & parse & order by pairs where possible to avoid monotony & produce alternation & a sense of dynamism, (& symmetry antecedes complementarity). & parse & order by following nontree edges whenever you feel like it & for however long you feel like it.

To summarize, parse & order by depthfirst treeparse, then by decreasing number of lines where possible, then by pairs either horizontal or vertical, then by nontree edges whenever you feel like it. (& hexagrams are notated on the lefthand, & their nontree bidirectional edges are notated on the righthand. & "self < >" means a hexagram's nontree bidirectional edges lead to the other hexagram in the pair.)

 

HOW TO ASSIGN MEANING TO THE DFAs

There are two variations of the DFA. There are two major models of physics. One in which there are blackholes & whiteholes, & another in which there are only blackholes. The first variation resonates with the first model. The second variation resonates the second model.

1) first variation, probably not the right one, but the most interesting

"a" represents the creation of empty space, represented by 6 empty lines, (or six 0 values), which can either be instantaneous or last forever or something in between.

"b" & "b1234" represent inflation.

"b" represents something like a surge of energy, which is detectable by the single line, being moved between the uppermost & lowermost limits of the space. 'b1" represents something like a surge of energy pushing matter towards the uppermost & lowermost limits of space simultaneously. "b2" is like "b" but more energetic. "b3" is like two lines of matter floating around, moving up & down in space gently, & is a bit like "b1". "b4" is like "b3" except there's only one line & the energy is higher relative to "b3" but lower than in all other "b"s, & it can either be instantaneous or last forever or something in between. So altogether, it shows a surge of energy pushing against the boundaries of a relatively empty space, implying inflation, & then a dwindling of that energy until "b4", & then a steady state of matter floating around with medium energy. (Other hexagrams do not imply inflation because they do not have the combination of a relatively empty space & matter being consistently pushed against the limits of the space.)

Generally, the last or ending pairs lead back to "b" or "b1234", so all ends lead to the beginning. Most interestingly, "j4" leads to "b", so the last matter in the whole cycle, & just a single line, & low in energy because it changes positions minimally within the pair, becomes in "b" the first matter of a new cycle, & just a single line, & highly energetic. So, altogether, these lines are saying, that the end of each cycle or subcycle becomes the beginning of the next cycle or subcycle, (but, space is created only once & not again). This is like the Bubble Universe hypothesis.

An interesting point is that you can go from "b" or "b123" to the ends of other cycles or subcycles, & continue in a normal way, parsing by depthfirst & then by pairs, implying that matter is created during inflation. However, this doesn't fit any widely supported known model of physics. But there are models that say inflation creates matter.

Yet another interesting point is that, while the middles of the tertiaries of "g", "h2/3" & "i2/3" & "j2/3" all either alternate in an orbitlike way (for ?2s), or basically float forwards inertially, the middle tertiaries of "b" & "f" do not, implying that they are inflating too rapidly & energetically to allow orbit & inertia (in the case of "b"s tertiaries), or that they are being torn apart & along the edges also too rapidly & energetically to allow orbit & inertia (in the case of "f"s tertiaries). (& the middles of the tertiaries of "c" & "e" represent, respectively, the spaghettification of matter inside a blackhole, or the quick expulsion of matter inside a whitehole.) (& as an aside, "i3" is interesting because it doesn't float forwards inertially by going to itself & without alternation, but actually goes to "i", it's secondary, & in this way, both orbits & moves up & down at the same time. & it's suitable, because there's not too much matter like in "h1234" or too little like in "j1234", & there's just about enough empty space. & it's also like a subcycle within a subcycle.)

Interlude. There are 4 creative pairs. All other pairs are not creative. Only these 4 are. They are singleton complementaries & indicate creation of matter from different contexts of emptiness separated by time but not by context. (The other 28 pairs do not indicate creation by visual inspection.)

(w) "a" & "d" which represent absolute creation of empty space, & of matter from the blackhole singularity, which doesn't actually exist, & is just a pointless point.

(x) "c" & "e" which represent pocket creation of matter in an expanding space. "d" is the instance of creation of all matter. "e" is matter in a slightly expanded space.

(y) "c1" & "e1" which represent relative creation at the event horizon.

(z) "c4" & "e4" which represent relative creation at the cauchy horizon.

"c" represents the moment before creation. "c1234" represent a blackhole. "c1" represents the eternal infall (necessitating time dilation & some aspects of special relativity, & some aspects of general relativity) & inescapability (necessitating light speed limits & some aspects of special relativity, & some aspects of general relativity) of the event horizon. "c2/3" represents the spaghettification & tidal forcing of matter inside the blackhole, & because "c2/3" leads to & from "h4", it also represents the possibility of an infinitely large blackhole, & blackholes or whiteholes within blackholes, & the possibility of whole universes existing inside a blackhole, & also the possibility of matter or the observer to pass into a blackhole without experiencing time dilation. & the most archetypal moment to enter a blackhole is shortly after matter has had time to collapse into stars & then blackholes, which is roughly where "h4" is at, temporally within a cycle. "c4" represents the cauchy horizon, which is formed by the collapse of matter in "e", or leads to the creation of the matter in "e", not throughout the whole of space, but in a pocket. This is like the Bubble Universe hypothesis.

"e" either follows "d", in which case it represents the universe expanding slightly after the absolute creation of matter, or it follows "c4" in which case it represents the pocket creation of matter. "e1234" represent a whitehole, but in order for it to be a whitehole, it must be parsed from bottom to top, in which case, notice how only "c1234" & "e1234" begin from hexagrams with empty borders, which helps to distinguish them from every other secondary & tertiary subset in yet another way. "e1" represents the eternal infall from the inside & the inability to enter the whitehole from outside (necessitating physics we have no name for, yet) of the event horizon. "e2/3" represents the quick expulsion of matter inside the whitehole, & because "e2/3" leads to & from "j1", it also represents the possibility of an infinitely large whitehole, & whiteholes or blackholes within whiteholes, & the possibility of whole universes existing inside a whitehole, & also the possibility of matter or the observer to pass into a whitehole without experiencing something that cannot be described by current physics, because we have no real observation data or strongly supported hypotheses about whitehole horizons, but also the possibility of simply being caught up in the middle of a whitehole that spontaneously emerges out of nowhere, (&, in fact, whiteholes are hypothesized to spontaneously emerge out of nowhere). & the most archetypal moment to be caught up in a whitehole is right before everything is about to disappear for an observer, but also before the next cycle is about to start, which is roughly where "j1" is at, temporally within a cycle. "e4" represents the cauchy horizon, which is formed somehow by "c", & which somehow can lead to "c", suggesting the possibility of nascent whiteholes to simply disappear after formation, which has actually been hypothesized.

Also, blackholes archetypally tear accreted matter apart past the event horizon, so it makes sense to go from "h4" to "c2/3". Whiteholes on the other hand, archetypally expel accreted matter from the cauchy horizon, so it makes sense to go from "j1" to "e2/3". & the whitehole equivalent of the singularity is the whole universe outside the event horizon, whereas the blackhole singularity is just a pointless point ahead of the cauchy horizon.

"f" & "f1234" represent the moments after the big bang, the white hole cauchy horizon. They first split into a large mass of lines & a single line, then lose the furthest line, then split again into a smaller but still large mass of lines & a single line, then lose that single line. & without orbit or inertia. This represents the high energies of the early matterfilled universe. & "g" represents the dark ages, where everything is dispersed & nothing is coalesced. & "h" represents the beginning of reionization, & "h1" represents the completion of reionization. (Notably, you can go straight from "f3" to "h" & skip just the dark ages, or from "f" to "h1" & skip the dark ages & the beginning of reionization.) "h1234" & "ij" & their tertiaries represent entropy (& some other thermodynamics or chemistry ideas, such as gas laws) but with things outside the observable universe coming in & out of view. & going from "f" to "j", dark matter weakens & dark energy strengthens between "f" & "f1234" & "h" & "h1234" where the core is split into two, between "h" & "" & "i" & "" where the lone line in the core disappears, between "i" & "" & "j" & "" rapidly where the core splits & the other line disappears at the same time, combining the previous two steps into one, which resonates with the observed acceleration of the expansion of the universe.

& you can just jump around this DFA. There's no reason you can't. So that might be what's behind quantum mechanics, specifically quantum teleportation or Boltzmann's brain. & observation & the first person perspective might be a thing because of this DFA. & electromagnetism & the standard model & the chemical elements, I can't explain in relation to this DFA, but I think they might be just decorative to our physics, (as well as biology). Alternatively, jumping around this DFA also represents different contexts coming out of nowhere to replace the current context. So you could be experiencing "j4" but suddenly there's "c1", & it's not quantum teleportation, but just a blackhole suddenly appearing from outside of the observable universe & coming at you at very high speeds.

& an aside is that "b" & "b1234" resonate with the ringing bell hypotheses. & that if you look at everything else, it also altogether resonates with that hypotheses. (& another aside is that time & space & matter & emptiness & the hypothesized & partially observed granularity of the universe resonate with this DFA, & their beauty is altogether revealed by this DFA.) (& in another vein, 3 dimensions might be the minimally interesting dimension.)

1.1) variation of the first variation; probably not the right one

Imagine "a" & "d" paired up & set in the position you see in the second variation. In this case, there is absolute creation of matter only once & not again. & there is no blackhole singularity.

1.2) why the first variation & variation of the first variation probably aren't the right ones

Because our models don't have a whitehole spontaneously appearing immediately after the big bang. & because whiteholes haven't been observed.

2) second variation, probably the right one, but less interesting; overwrites the first in 3 major ways

"d" represents the big bang singularity, which creates all matter at once, & which happens only once & not again. So this variation has inflation as a pocketed expansion of matterfilled space.

"c" represents the moment prior to the creation of matter in a pocket. "e" is the moment of the creation of matter in a pocket. "c1" represents matter collapsing into an event horizon, & the eternal infall. "e1" represents matter that is visible immediately after crossing the event horizon & the inability of objects inside a blackhole to escape through the event horizon. "c2/e2" & "c3/e3" represent the tidal forcing of matter & then the coalescing of matter towards the cauchy horizon. "c4" is the cauchy horizon. "e4" is the singularity. Notably, these pairs are explicit pairs, & not just implicit pairs as is the case in the first variation.

The singularity in large blackholes (& most blackholes are archetypally large near the end of a cycle of time) is far from the event horizon, so there is no tidal forcing of matter at entry, so to go from "j1" to "c3/e3" makes sense. The singularity in smaller blackholes (& most blackholes are archetypally small near the beginning of a cycle of time) is closer to the event horizon, so there is tidal forcing of matter at entry, so to go from "h4" to "c2/e2" makes sense. & going from "c2/e2" to "c3/e3" makes sense because primordial blackholes at their instance of formation are probably small & the size of the Chandrasekhar limit (so there is tidal forcing first & then accretion), & while they do grow, the observer is archetypally caught up by one right after the instance of formation. (& it makes sense to go from "c2/e2" to "h4" because it's from one beginninglike to another, & it makes sense to go from "c3/e3" to "j1" because it's from one endlike to another.)

& as an aside, the middle pairs of all tertiary sets can be swapped repeatedly (& in middle of parsing & ordering) & still make sense. The DFAs are very flexible. You could swap the positions of "c2/e2" & "c3/e3" & that would make alot more sense in some ways, because "h4" would lead to the new "c3/e3" & which represents the immediate tidal forcing before the cauchy horizon in smaller blackholes, & because "j1" would lead to the new "c2/e2" & then the new "c3/e3" & which represents the longer journey before the tidal forcing & then the cauchy horizon in larger blackholes. & the reason I didn't do it that way in the 2nd variation diagram is because I wanted to capture the experience of falling into an archetypal primordial blackhole, & because I wanted to capture the sense of nonstop alternation of complementarities in the 2nd secondary. "c23/e23" are very weird yes.

& the main reason that I think this is the right variation is because the spatial orthogonality of the blackhole interior relative to the external universe is best captured by pairing things that should be vertical in horizontal ways as seen in "c2/e2" & "c3/e3". It's childish logic but it kinda works, I think.

 

WHY NOT ODDS? WHY 6 DIGITS & NOT 4 OR 8 OR HIGHER? & OTHER THINGS ABOUT THEM

Odd digit length strings of length x cannot be turned into this kind of DFA by taking halves — but they can be mapped in categorylike ways onto the 1st primaries & their secondaries & tertiaries in the even digit length strings of length x + 1. They show endless creation with relatively? low entropy.

4 is too compressed & has no blackhole or whitehole. 8 & highers have recursive or fractal blackholes & whiteholes & more detailed inertias & orbits, among other features, but are too repetitive. 8 & higher are mathematically & possibly metaphysically interesting, but not resonant with our current physics models.

4 to 6 to 8 & highers' DFAs are also partially mappable onto each other in categorylike ways, & nontree edges of type A in lower DFAs compress the nontree edges of type B in higher DFAs (ex. 4's nontree edges based on substrings 34 & 12 compress 6's nontree edges based on substrings 345 + 234, & 6's nontree edges of substring 456 + 123 compress 8's nontree edges of substring 4567 + 2345), & you can generate more edges between DFAs by playing with their substrings in every possible way that maps these DFAs back unto each other & maybe themselves. What you get doing the 1st thing, is a fractal of DFAs. What you get doing the 2nd thing after doing the 1st thing, is a more interesting fractal of DFAs. What you get doing the 3rd thing after that, is an interesting mess AFAIK. (& Grothendieck's topoi resonates alot with the 1st of these objects.)

 

"c1/e1" are like the outer event horizon. "c1a/e1a" is like the first inner event horizon. They are able to go back & forth between their counterparts. "c1d/e1d" are like the first inner cauchy horizon. They are able to go back & forth between each other. The blackhole & whitehole underneath "c4/e4" are like in the 6 digits DFA. Notably, you can go from "c1d" to either "e1d" or "c2". & that's like going into a new "universe" by either going through a whitehole or staying in the blackhole. & it gets more elaborate with higher digits, but generally follows a pattern of increasingly recursive or fractal blackholes & whiteholes. & you can do something similar for the whitehole, either going through a blackhole or staying in the whitehole at "e4/c4".

 

MUSIC COMPOSITION METHOD

You can map the hexagrams onto chords in any scale, & then play them in the default way to read them, & then play variations based on following the nontree edges.

 

CONSILIENCE

This combines computer science (DFAs, binaries, strings, & trees), math (graphs, combinatorics, fractals, category theory, topology as in our physics is a topological distortion on this, number theory, linear algebra, universal algebra, group theory, order theory, measure theory, analysis as in you can do this with continuous & not just discrete objects & continuously, probability & ergodic theory as in this is the archetype & cantus firmus & all observers counterpoint this, set theory, proof theory, recursion theory, information theory, approximation theory, & topoi), (& also, you can perform this & similar operations on just about any math object), music, physics, language, philosophy (metaphysics & aesthetics & ethics), & anthropology (because binaries & dualities & spectrums & combinatorics of qualities resonate with this DFA, & because gestalt psychology).

 

CRACKPOTTERY

Biology & psychology & sociology on this planet, & maybe throughout this universe, might be the way they are because of this DFA. The social & mental & physical energies of all life on Earth grows & decays in the ways seen in this DFA. The 1st secondary is like insemination. The 2nd is like gestation in & then expulsion from the womb or egg. The 3rd is like the period of growth until puberty, which slows down until puberty. The 4th is like puberty. The 5th is like adulthood. The 6th is like old age. Many other important processes might also follow this DFA, & this DFA is best represented in a bivariable manner by the Tracy Widom distribution, which is famous for capturing the essence of many processes.